Press enter to see results or esc to cancel.

40 “GirlsDoPorn” Sex Trafficking Survivors Sue Pornhub’s Parent Organization for Profiting from Their Exploitation

Upon Tuesday, December 15th, forty women identified as “ Anne Doe” filed a lawsuit towards Mindgeek, porn site large Pornhub’ s parent organization, for allegedly knowingly profiting from images and videos of their sexual intercourse trafficking nightmares and faltering to properly moderate Mindgeek-owned websites for the abusive videos. The suit, which was filed within the Southern District of Ca, seeks punitive and compensatory damages of more than $80 million.

In total, the lawsuit is demanding over $40 million in damages—at least $1 million per plaintiff—as well as the money Mindgeek earned from hosting and promoting their videos plus legal fees, Vice reviews.

These women were reportedly trafficked by amateur porn production business, “ GirlsDoPorn, ” many of whom were outright fooled, forced, and coerced directly into shooting sex on video tape and then lied to about where the footage would end up. Shortly after being filmed, in each of these women’ s cases, the footage ended up upon major porn sites associated with their real names and private information. In many cases, these videos ended up on Pornhub.

“ As being a proximate result of MindGeek’s understanding financial benefit and participation in GirlsDoPorn’s sex trafficking venture, Plaintiffs have suffered damages, including, but not limited to, severe emotional distress, substantial trauma, attempted suicide, plus social and familial ostracization, ” the complaint says. “Further, MindGeek has obtained ill-gotten gains by marketing, marketing and exploiting videos featuring the Plaintiffs’ likenesses. ”

This particular lawsuit builds off of case that went to trial a year ago on behalf of 22 Jane Will against GirlsDoPorn. It is not clear whether all or some of these twenty two Jane Does have joined this particular newest lawsuit against Mindgeek.

It’ s worth noting that Ruben Andre Garcia, 31, the particular male performer in GirlsDoPorn videos, changed his plea in early December from not guilty to guilty of “ conspiracy to commit sex trafficking” and “ sex trafficking by force, fraud, plus coercion. ”

Related: 22 Women Paid $12. 7 Million Plus Given Rare Ownership Rights In GirlsDoPorn Lawsuit

Stop The Demand - guava

Wait, what is “ GirlsDoPorn, ” again?

If you haven’ big t heard of the “ GirlsDoPorn” case before or need a refresher, let’ s back up and fill you within.

A few years ago, in 2015 and earlier, hundreds of women were apparently lured to San Diego to get what many of them didn’ capital t know were actually movie shoots for GirlsDoPorn. They were fed alcohol and medications, coerced into signing thick contracts with incomprehensible legal jargon, and pushed directly into performing sex on camera—for 7 painful hours, in some instances.

A short time afterwards, that footage was submitted on GirlsDoPorn’ s website and uploaded to other well-known free porn tube sites, including Pornhub, despite the guarantee that the footage would just be distributed via Dvd disks on the other side of the world. Many of the women said viewers discovered and published their complete names online, resulting in serious harassment and suicidal thoughts, for a few of them.

Read our unique interview with one Jane Doe who told us exactly what happened and how it has affected her for years.

Starting in 2016, nearly 2 dozen of the sexually used women took a risk and banded together in order to sue the GirlsDoPorn webmasters, Michael Pratt, 36, plus Matthew Wolfe, 37, and also actor and recruiter Andre Garcia. After a years-long legal battle, a California judge in January 2020 not just ordered GirlsDoPorn to pay the 22 women $12. seven million in damages, but took a rare and unprecedented step: he granted all of them ownership rights to the content material.

“ It’ s an extraordinarily special and incredibly valuable decision, ” Ben Bull, vice leader and general counsel on the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, told BuzzFeed News at the time of the January 2020 choice. “ It will blaze a trail for other lawyers and victims to come to their rear and essentially do the same thing. ”

Related: Pornhub Just Removed More than Half Of The Site’s Content In A Purge Of Unverified Videos

Here’ s what Hillcrest Superior Court Judge Kevin Enright wrote in his choice:

“ Defendants’ tactics have caused the videos to become common knowledge in plaintiffs’ communities and among their relationships and peers—the very thing that plaintiffs feared and that defendants expressly assured them would not happen. As a result, plaintiffs have got suffered and continue to experience far-reaching and often tragic consequences. ”

Enright also called the operation a “ fraudulent scheme” that targeted young women who also “ are mostly students with careers ahead of them who have only even considered Defendants’ solicitations to film the pornographic video due to a few immediate and pressing financial need. ”

He ordered GirlsDoPorn’ t founder Pratt, his business partner Wolfe, and porn actor Garcia to hand over-all images, videos, likenesses, and copyrights and to take “ active steps” to remove all of them from circulation. Even nevertheless, porn consumers all over the internet who had the videos downloaded have continually uploaded plus re-uploaded these GirlsDoPorn videos and images to multiple different porno sites over the last few years, even with the decision was handed down in January 2020.

Hopefully Pornhub’ s latest decision to stop users through being able to download videos on the site and prohibit the upload of videos from unverified users will help to stop the particular spread of the GirlsDoPorn movies, though the videos have been discussed to other porn tube sites.

Related: Visa And Mastercard Sever Ties With Pornhub Due To Abusive Content On The Site

People Are Not Products - White

Web site owner still at large and criminally charged with intercourse trafficking

Buzzfeed News reports that the males behind GirlsDoPorn still encounter federal charges of intercourse trafficking and producing kid porn, since some of the exploited individuals were 17 during the time of filming. Wolfe and Garcia are in custody. Pratt fled the US and is now the fugitive, likely in his country of New Zealand, and a 10 dollars, 000 reward is being offered by the FBI for ideas that lead to his capture.

Attorneys for that men could not immediately be reached, but in a statement to Courthouse News Program, they said their clients “ are focused on defending by themselves against the criminal charges. ”

Related: Rape, Drugs, & Forced Porno: Here’s How Modeling Frauds Lure Unsuspecting Victims

“ The particular government’s burden of proof in the criminal case is ‘beyond a reasonable doubt, ’ which is a much higher standard within this civil lawsuit in which the burden of proof is really a mere preponderance of the proof, ” the attorneys additional. “ The findings of fact in the civil situation do not carry over to the criminal case where the authorities will have to prove the facts under a much more stringent standard. ”

“ It’ s vindication for the courageous women who came forwards after being manipulated plus lied to by GirlsDoPorn, ” Ed Chapin, the particular lead attorney for the injured parties, told BuzzFeed News. “ They were young and unskilled, and their lives had been changed because they were sucked in by this nauseating, fraudulent scheme. ”

Click here to read about how GirlsDoPorn producers trafficked lots of women, profited from their abuse, and are now facing intercourse trafficking charges.

Don't Buy The Lie - White

The genre of entitlement

Of course , not every porn company tricks, forces, or coerces performers to have intercourse on camera. Even so, regrettably, it happens way too often—we’ve heard too many stories of the porn industry’s sketchy dealings, and this GirlsDoPorn story is just one more added to the list.

Courtney Trouble, the performer, had this to say about working in porn:

“As a vice industry, [porn] can attract people who only want to be part of the fantasy way of living of partying and intercourse. Stigma against porn… is what makes men like this think they can get away with exploiting fighting women or established experts. ”

Related : The particular Porn Industry’s Dark Secrets: Not All Porn Is Consensual

Yet even if the stigma against porn and its performers didn’t can be found, there would still be sexual intercourse trafficking and exploitation.

In the case of GirlsDoPorn, the company’s scheme is not only damaging to many women but it also feeds a good entitled porn fantasy associated with young women who normally would never be in a porn film resorting to performing to fund student loans but need some convincing (read: coercion) to play along.

On paper about this case, Samantha Cole described the genre as “a fantasy that plays on coercion, and a real-life version of the ‘casting couch’ porn trope, which blurs the line between reality plus fiction”—and sex trafficking, we may add.

There is little or no thought of how a younger woman feels in that situation—and worse, to consumers, it is more exciting because of just how tricked, betrayed, and violated she feels afterward. It is unclear whether Mindgeek will be held accountable for all of the damage their business practices has caused on these exploited women.

To read read more about how Pornhub has deleted over 10 million video clips from the site in an attempt to get exploitative content under control, click the link.

The post forty “ GirlsDoPorn” Sex Trafficking Survivors Sue Pornhub’ h Parent Company for Profiting from Their Exploitation appeared initial on Fight the New Medication.